Indirect Feminism in Slight Fever of a 20 Year Old

Image

Image from NYtimes.com

               I find “queer” cinema’s imbalanced presentation of gays over lesbians a disturbing case of the pot calling the kettle black.  As Pick notes, “While ‘queer’ ideally signals an emancipated (and potentially limitless) range of sexual and social relations, most of the products identified as ‘new’ and ‘queer’ were in contrast overwhelmingly male…does ‘queer’ stand for…the reintroduction of male hegemony, through the back door as it were?” (105).  A transgressive medium that is supposed to provide progressive alternatives to limited mainstream thinking continues to perpetuate patriarchy by silencing women. Lesbians are practically invisible in the genre. Upon first glance, this seems the case in Slight Fever of a 20 Year Old (1993), a film that appears to focus exclusively on budding homosexuality in young male prostitutes. However, the objectified role of prostitutes reflects the commodification of women typical in male dominated countries. By seeing men mistreated in roles commonly doled out to women, we begin to see the horror synonymous with selling oneself. In the film, the girlfriends are not to be diminished; the unfulfilled crushes they experience are staples of the young lesbian experience.

A telling scene transpires between Tatsuru and a john. The customer, an older gentleman, asks the boy to massage his shoulders, an act traditionally designated to women of service. The man tells Tatsuru how he wishes he had a boy like him for a son rather than his daughter. The statement implies that if he had a son he would molest him, but that his daughter, given his homosexual bent, is useless. Denial of sexual vitality to women is crippling when their sensual prowess comprises their worth. The incestuous image is particularly creepy when one considers that many young women quietly suffer molestation at the hands of male relatives—including fathers. The john’s heterosexual façade feeds prostitution: The only institution in which he can explore his true nature while maintaining his accepted cover as straight husband and father. The myth of the nuclear family and normalized heterosexuality are inextricably linked for each lie needs the other to survive. Traditional marriage stifles female advancement in addition to that of homosexuals; straying from the ritual of “man and wife” means instant marginalization. For many, seedy professions like prostitution are the only options available once family and friends close doors.

Both boys—Tatsuru and Shin—have very flirty female friends who are spirited, outspoken, and arguably, quite strong. The girls’ craving for male attention is apparent; they actively pursue the boys who couldn’t care less about their cute fashion and long legs. The rejection and unsatisfied desire experienced by females in the film is a strong theme in lesbian stories. In a world in which women are defined by their relationship to men, women are encouraged to separate from one another; same-sex desire conflicts with the need to survive. Pleasure is traded for property—house, security, and respect (which depend entirely on an opposite sex partner). As a result, some young lesbians repress their passions. Even when they do confess, they are often turned down by the object of forbidden affection who realizes the danger inherent in girl-on-girl desire. Female frustration shown in the film’s straight females is, therefore, reminiscent of lesbian abjection.

Lesbians and gays share the oppression inflicted by the heteronormative machine; it’s time queer cinema shows both of their struggles directly by representing men AND women explicitly. Otherwise, injustice is advanced disguised as progressivism.

 

Pick, Anat. “New Queer Cinema and Lesbian Films.” New Queer Cinema: A Critical      Reader. Ed. Michele Aaron. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers UP, 2004. 103-18. Print.

Slight Fever of a 20 Year Old. Dir. Ryosuke Hashiguchi. Perf. Yoshihiko Hakamada    and Masashi Endo. Pia/Pony Canyon, 1993. DVD.

Advertisements

2 comments

  1. I love that you bring up the importance of the female roles in this movie because they are very important in the message the director is trying to get across of challenging traditional roles. These men are playing the role of prostitute which women are typically placed in through cinema. I have to admit that it was unsettling for me to see men in this position of objectification. Women in general are underrepresented and oppressed by the society in which they live. The scenes you mention stood out to me as well but another technique the director uses is background sound. When Tatsuru’s lady friend is explaining her dissatisfaction with the role of being someone’s girlfriend because she feels like she is owned by the man exemplifies this. The ambient noise and a song play almost louder than her actual voice. To me it reflects the director acknowledging that women’s voices are often unheard and their desires are drowned by society. I thought this film to be progressive but now that you shine a light on how underrepresented the females are as well as their repressed desires since they force themselves to go after uninterested male targets.

  2. A very unique inspection of the film that I did not originally take into consideration. The queerness often is centralized around the gay male experience and all other forms of queerness are marginalized. Your points regarding the strange incestual comments the client makes can slip by easily. It is interesting to see the greater meaning behind his comments when given that the two cross paths again at the client’s own home. When it comes to challenging the heternormative ideals that dictate which stories get told, we must recognize that there are non-binary queer identities and experiences that must also be told. So rather than focus on the stories of only the queer men and women lets recognize that there are stories and experiences of all queer people that need to be expressed at the same level. However, in terms of focusing on the film specifically your points are very valid.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s